Open Source RDBMS - Seamless, Scalable, Stable and Free

한국어 | Login |Register

CUBRID Python 8.4.1 QA Test Report


NHN China Platform QA Team confirmed that CUBRID-Python 8.4.1 product has a good quality base on the scope in report to unveil for users.

Our gratitude goes to Li Cheng-Long as PM, Zhang Hui as Dev, QA team manager Hu Xiang-We, QA2 part Li Ying, Guo Rui and zoujing as tester.


Note: N/A.


Module change after the QA OK Sign should proceed in agreement with the QA personnel.

1. Quality Measurement Result

Functional Test

Performance Test

Security Test

※ Describe test results as Pass, Fail, Not Executed, or N/A (N/A means not applicable to the project; and tests planned but not executed are classified into the Not Executed category)

Pass

Pass

N/A

Quality indicator at realization phase

QA start conditions

CUBRID-Perl-8.4.0

Remark

Functional realization rate (%)

100%

100%

1. python_cubrid.c code's lines are 956
2. Dev didn't provide code Complexity figures in hudson

# of source-code lines (LOC)

-

956

Unit test code coverage (%)

70%

72.19%

# of critical errors at the static analysis

N/A

N/A

Code complexity

c10 or higher (%)

N/A

N/A

c30 or higher (%)

N/A

N/A

Coding standard conformance rate

N/A

N/A

Quality indicator at QA test phase

Quality objective

QA test result

Test case execution rate

100%

100%

Test success rate

100%

99%

Two cci bugs are active
    - APIS-92
    - APIS-90

QA test code coverage

70%

78.5%

Error correction completion rate

100%

100%

No. of residual errors by criticality

Blocker

0

0

Critical

0

0

Major

0

0

Minor

0

0

Trivial

0

0

Security vulnerability by risk rating (#)

Critical

N/A

N/A

Major

N/A

N/A

Minor

N/A

N/A

Defect occurrence rate (All defects/KLOC)

N/A

N/A

Residual defect rate (# of not-fixed defects/KLOC)

N/A

N/A

Specifics of QA test defects

QA Test Result

Remark

Overall information (Effective defect)

Total

7

Two cci bugs are active
    - APIS-92
    - APIS-90

Active

2

Closed

5

Detailed information of closed defects (#)

Fixed

5

Won't Fix

0

Cannot reproduce

0

PostPoned

2

Roll back

0

PostPone

0

By design

0

Not a Defect

Duplicate

0

Not a Bug

0

Test tool defect

0

Test Environment

0

Tester error (mistake)

0

※ Describe the QA start conditions and quality objectives of QA test phase set during the planning; and enter reasons of not measuring or not following them.

2. Test result summary and QA comment

※ Summarize test results and briefly describe QA comments.

If functionality/performance/security tests are not done, the description should include the reasons of non-execution.

※ If not relevant, put N/A in the field (N/A means not applicable to the project).

Test Type

Brief description of known key issues as per test results

Result of Functional Test

Finished function test, 7 defects were reported , 5 defects were fixed, 2 defects were marked postponed status

Result of Performance Test

Base on the scope in report, test result is : Pass

Known Issue

2 defects were maked as postponed for the reason return values by CCI were not correct
    - APIS-92
    - APIS-90

comments powered by Disqus
Page info
viewed 1214 times
translations en
Author
posted 2 years ago by
hellohuizhang
Contributors
updated 2 years ago by
View revisions
tagged
Share this article